Good morning folks. I would be delighted if you are able and interested, to join me in developing this latest blog of mine. Everybody is welcome and there are no right or wrong opinions. A little while back I took part in what became a very interesting and informative discussion on this, and I will share the thoughts and opinions that came out as it went along.
So to kick it off, some people were of the opinion that a "photo-realistic" painting is boring, unimaginative, lifeless and is lacking in depth. One response to that was, “Maybe photo-realism tells the viewer too much, there’s not enough left to the imagination. All the facts are there. Maybe there’s too much information, the human brain likes to keep things simple. Some of the best artists in the world keep their paintings simple. They convey one idea at a time. Too many ideas in one painting can complicate".
Now for me, even though detail and accurately portraying what I see is important, it is never my aim to paint the actual objects I see, but in all my paintings it is about painting light and contrasts and shapes which will always be of an impressionistic nature.
Who will be the first to make a comment below?